Tuesday, June 24, 2014

  Myrtle Fillmore: Initial Reflections

In previous classes, Dr. Tom has talked about the importance of "lenses." These lenses profoundly influence how we see things and make connections. The lenses that I wear have influenced what I see in terms of Myrtle Fillmore's theology.

I came to Unity in 1986. My relationship with my mother was a difficult one to say the least. I often found her to be sharply critical and negative. What first attracted me to Unity was the profound sense of love, acceptance, and the concept of my inmate goodness. My first Unity minister was a woman as were most of the other ministers in my church. As I learned more about Unity, I identified this feminine warmth, acceptance, and love with Myrtle Fillmore. How much of this identification is justified by the actual facts is something I wish to explore in this course. But-- for better or for worse–– these are the "lenses" that I bring into this course.

Myrtle grew up in a strict and austere Methodist home. The family church preached hellfire and damnation. At a very young age Myrtle rejected the notions of original sin. She also did not believe that Christian churches had a monopoly on truth. When she lived with Charles in Colorado, she came to the conclusion that many Native Americans, given their practices, were  far closer to Spirit than many of the middle-class Christians that she knew.

Facing tuberculosis, Myrtle had what the Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous calls "a vital spiritual experience." Through this healing experience Myrtle came to believe the essential goodness of human beings and that the same spiritual force that was inside of Jesus is inside of all of us. This Christ within heals and "brings life and brings it abundantly." She felt it was important to share these truths with all who would listen and learn.

While at times she could speak of this relationship with spirit as an abstraction, there were other times when she felt a deep relationship with a personal God. For example, there were times when she would take two chairs and face them at each other. In one of the chairs she would put a large portrait of Jesus, and she would sit in the other chair facing the portrait. Then she would have a "chat" with Jesus.

Myrtle viewed Unity as part of Christianity. In fact, Charles and Myrtle removed Unity from one of the early new thought alliances because they felt that the alliance was down-playing Jesus.

I look forward to seeing how much of the above is supported by actual facts and how much of it is myth (and I am using the word myth in the sense that  Joseph Campbell would use it.) I am curious if at the end of this class I will cringe at what I've written above or find that it is essentially supported by the facts.  Well, whichever it is I'm looking forward to this journey.

7 comments:

  1. Good start. You identified one of the major questions to consider in this course, i.e., Myrtle Page Fillmore's doctrine of God. What do her letters and other written works reveal about her actual theology? She is quite comfortable using the word "Creator" for a God-synonym. Does that imply a creature-Creator relationship, which is an essential element in monotheism? When she speaks of the divine within, we are suddenly back into the ante-Nicene controversies. Is Myrtle saying the human and divine have inherent sameness (homoousios), or do humans merely have a spiritual similarity to the divine (homoiousios)? Could there be other options? I'm not pushing any of these, and frankly I'm excited about learning what the class consensus will be as we grapple with the depths of Myrtle's thought.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Richard. loved how you were able to tie your early upbringing to the Myrtle experience. Regarding your comment, "At a very young age Myrtle rejected the notions of original sin," I had not heard that before and it intrigues me. It tells me that she was formulating her belief system many years before she began her self-healing work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rick, I loved how you self aware you are about the role that your personal lens, and, in particular, your relationships vis a vis your mother/women/divine feminine interrelate--and impact if not how you relate to God perhaps flavor how you view what constitutes nurturing spiritual community. It certainly makes me wonder why I was initially much more interested in the masculine (Charles's) teachings than in Myrtle's. Ironically, it may have been for the same reason you were interested in the warm, feminine nature that Myrtle at least symbolizes. I grew up with a very critical mother and generally avoided females and female figures for most of my life. I then came to overvalue masculine/yang traits and my path has very much been about learning to embrace the softer feminine and to realize that feminine energy doesn't necessarily equate to harshness as I experienced in the past. I'm also interested in how both Myrtle and Charles referred to God--sometimes in a very personal way. I think that I've always re-interpreted that in my head to say they didn't MEAN IT and it was just a product of their culture/time--but that's one way I've applied my personal lens to see everything the two teach as pure/mystical rather than perhaps referring to both a God that is pure Principle AND a God that is deeply personal. Hmm...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unlike you, it was just a few years ago that I walked into my first Unity church and had my first "Unity" experience; the love and the acceptance--totally awesome! I was not aware that Myrtle thought the Native Americans were closer to Spirit than most Christians she knew. I find that rather interesting. Thanks for yet another candid post!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm intrigued, also, about the reference to Native Americans and their practices being closer to Spirit. Like Leah, I'd like to know more about that. There is so little written BY Myrtle and that which is written ABOUT Myrtle void of actual interviews, that I have found myself hungry for "facts". I realize that both Myrtle and Charles kept those "facts" to themselves, primarily, not wanting to be the focus of Unity, but wanting students to hunger after the experience of Truth instead. And yes, I share the same interest in seeing if what I think I know is closely or even somewhat related to what I will discover in this class.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Daybree,

    Rev Tom Witherspon, the author of the second Myrtle Fillmore biography that Dr Tom has suggested, recorded a good number to talks about the Fillmores and Unity history. I believe the web page I heard it on was Truth.net. But it that is not it, google around for his talks. They provide a great deal of insight and interesting stories.

    Best,

    Rick

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rick, I love how you are worrying about how you may cringe at the end of this class after you have had time to study Myrtle and her teachings. There is nothing to worry about. What you know is all true so there is nothing to fear. You will just gain more. I especially like how you pointed out Myrtles realization that the Native American's were closer to Spirit than were the Christians. It would seem there is truth in that since Native American's have a reverence for all of life, living things, one another and the great Spirit. Thanks for the share.

    ReplyDelete